Ridgeland, September 25, 2025
News Summary
The Ridgeland Town Council voted 4-1 against the annexation and development of the Tickton Hall property, a decision influenced by local residents’ concerns over environmental impacts, infrastructure, and traffic congestion. The proposal included building 2,000 homes and commercial space, but significant community opposition led to the council’s decisive rejection during a pivotal meeting. Approximately 85 residents attended, voicing various concerns, especially regarding wastewater management and potential financial burdens on the town.
Ridgeland Town Council has officially rejected plans for the annexation and development of the Tickton Hall property, marking a significant decision for the local community. The council voted 4-1 against the annexation proposed by developers including Tickton Hall Investments, LLC; Euhaw Holdings, LLC; Tickton Hall Holdings LLC; and Pepper Hall LLC. The property in question consists of 1,520 acres of mostly undeveloped land positioned east of Highway 462, approximately eight miles from Ridgeland proper.
The development initially aimed to construct 2,000 new homes alongside 250,000 square feet of commercial space. However, concerns from local residents about environmental impacts, traffic congestion, and the adequacy of infrastructure put significant pressure on the council’s deliberation. Approximately 85 residents attended the meeting, many of whom expressed their opposition by wearing distinctive blue T-shirts against the project.
During this pivotal meeting, sixteen residents voiced their opinions, addressing critical issues ranging from environmental degradation to wastewater management. Notable concerns were raised regarding the town’s capacity to manage increased traffic and the projected financial implications tied to the proposed development. Former General Manager of the Beaufort-Jasper Water and Sewer Authority, Dean Moss, highlighted significant challenges related to wastewater treatment, questioning the feasibility of maintaining water pressure without sourcing an additional overhead storage tank potentially costing $10 million.
The meeting saw contributions from prominent community members. Ridgeland Mayor Joey Malphrus articulated that the proposed development would not align with the Town’s Comprehensive Plan and would impose an unnecessary financial burden on the municipality’s resources. Councilwoman Libby Malphrus pointed out the council’s intention to avoid replicating issues faced by nearby Bluffton, which has experienced infrastructure challenges in the wake of rapid development.
During the council’s inquiries into the developers’ plans, skepticism arose regarding stormwater management solutions following significant rainfall. Ridgeland Town Administrator Dennis Averkin remarked that no definitive plan existed for wastewater effluent treatment, and this ambiguity contributed significantly to the council’s decision to reject the proposal. The development team faced significant scrutiny for their lack of concrete plans for essential services, including fire protection that the new community would require.
After much debate and discussion, the vote concluded decisively with a rejection of the annexation, zoning changes, and development agreement by a margin of 4-1.
Background Context
As development pressures continue to increase across the region, local governments are often faced with the challenge of balancing growth with environmental and community concerns. The Tickton Hall project was no exception and showcased how local engagement can significantly influence municipal decisions.
In response to the significant turnout, it is evident that community members are increasingly prioritizing their voices in local governmental processes. The Ridgeland Town Council’s decision serves as a reminder of the importance of public involvement in shaping the future development of their town.
FAQ
What was the outcome of the Ridgeland Town Council meeting regarding Tickton Hall?
The Ridgeland Town Council voted 4-1 to reject the annexation of the Tickton Hall property proposed by multiple developers.
How large is the Tickton Hall property?
The proposed annexation involved 1,520 acres of mostly undeveloped land located east of Highway 462.
What was the proposed development plan for Tickton Hall?
The development plan envisioned construction of 2,000 new homes and 250,000 square feet of commercial space.
What concerns did residents express during the council meeting?
Residents raised concerns regarding environmental degradation, wastewater management, traffic congestion, and financial implications for the town.
Why did the council reject the Tickton Hall project?
The council cited issues such as the project being inconsistent with the Town’s Comprehensive Plan, potential financial burdens, and a lack of solid plans for wastewater effluent treatment as reasons for rejecting the project.
Key Features of the Tickton Hall Proposal
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Proposed Land Area | 1,520 acres |
| Residential Units | 2,000 new homes |
| Commercial Space | 250,000 square feet |
| Distance from Ridgeland | 8 miles |
| Council Vote Outcome | 4-1 against annexation |
| Community Attendance | 85 residents |
| Key Concerns | Environmental degradation, wastewater management, traffic congestion, financial implications |
Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic
HERE Resources
Beaufort County Council Rejects Pine Island Development Proposal
Ridgeland Town Council Rejects Tickton Hall Annexation Request
Beaufort County Council to Discuss Major Zoning Changes
Ridgeland Town Council Considers Major Tickton Hall Development
Controversial Development Proposals in Beaufort County
Additional Resources
- Post and Courier: Tickton Hall Development
- WTOC: Ridgeland’s Proposed Annexation Plan
- Live 5 News: Keep Chelsea Rural Group
- Island Packet: Opinion on Local Development
- Post and Courier: Tickton Hall Development in Jasper County
- Wikipedia: Urban Sprawl
- Google Search: Community Engagement in Local Government
- Google Scholar: Local Government Development Issues
- Encyclopedia Britannica: City Planning
- Google News: Ridgeland Annexation
Author: STAFF HERE BEAUFORT
The HERE Beaufort Staff Writers are a collaborative team of journalists, editors, and local contributors passionate about delivering accurate, timely information to the Beaufort community. As part of the HEREcity.com Network, which powers over 100 U.S. city sites including HEREcolumbia.com, our staff draws on collective experience in South Carolina journalism to cover everything from business sales and real estate developments to dining deals and community initiatives. Our Expertise and Background: Local Roots in Beaufort : Our team includes lifelong Beaufort residents and SC natives with deep knowledge of the area’s history, economy, and culture. We’ve covered key events like the recent sale of the historic Crofts Block Building, Beaufort’s equestrian heritage, and growth in local tech and education sectors (e.g., BeaufortTechnical College programs). Collective Experience: With over 50 combined years in journalism, our staff has backgrounds in print, digital media, and community reporting. We prioritize fact-based stories, drawing from sources like the Beaufort Chamber of Commerce, city government records, and on-the-ground interviews. Commitment to Quality: Every article is a group effort, involving research, editing, and verification to ensure reliability. We adhere to journalistic standards, citing credible sources and updating content as new details emerge.
